Chapter 4a: The Threshold

A meditation on contemplating death, between the Kali interlude and the Void.

I. Whitman in the Reading Year

She had read Whitman in the reading year, not carefully, not in any edition that was better than the one she had found on a shelf at a used bookshop the previous summer. She had read him the way people read Whitman: a few pages of Song of Myself, the barbaric yawp, the list of occupations, the leaves of grass themselves. She had put the book down. She had not returned to him.

She returned to him in the months after the retreat, because one of the mythologists she had been listening to that year — on the podcast a friend had sent her early, the one that would later turn out to have interviewed her teacher — had said, in passing, something that would not leave her alone.

The claim was this. Whitman had probably, in the years before the 1855 first edition of Leaves of Grass, had a species of awakening that no one in mid-nineteenth-century America had a framework to receive. He had written the book from inside it. The book was the awakening trying to find a shape the English language could carry. Then — the mythologist's reading, offered with care, not as certainty — Whitman had begun to come apart. Not because the awakening had failed. Because no one could meet him in it. The voice that had written I celebrate myself, and sing myself had begun, by the early 1860s, to drift into a hubris the voice itself would not have recognized a decade earlier. He was not the first. He would not be the last. The list of contemplatives who reach recognition without a community that can hold it, and who lose the recognition to the very self that had found it, is long in every tradition.

What had brought Whitman back — this was the mythologist's reading — was the Civil War. Whitman had gone to Washington in December 1862 looking for his brother, who had been wounded at Fredericksburg. He had stayed. He had spent the next three years sitting by the beds of dying soldiers in the military hospitals of the capital, writing letters home for men who could not write, holding the hands of boys who were leaving their bodies, watching something the awakening had described become, in the unclean reality of amputations and fevers and trench-mouth, the thing itself. The Wound-Dresser was written from that work. Drum-Taps was written from that work. The voice that came out of the war was not the voice that had gone in. The hubris had composted. What remained was quieter.

She read Drum-Taps first. She read Song of Myself second. She read them in that order because the mythologist had said, almost as an aside, that the second voice knew something the first voice had only been able to claim. The first voice sang it. The second voice had sat with it.

II. The Man Who Had Been Initiated in Almost Everything

At the retreat — she would not remember this until months later, when she read Whitman in the apartment — she had met a man who, in the closing circle, had spoken in a register she had not yet had categories for. He was not the silver-haired retreatant who had testified to the community's integrity. He was another man. Middle-aged, foreign accent she could not place, who had been mostly silent during the five days and had then, in the circle on the last evening, offered a sequence of sentences the room did not know where to put.

He had said, briefly and without flourish, that he had been initiated in almost every tradition he had walked into. He named a few. She was not able to track them all. Kashmir Śaivism; Theravāda; Mahāyāna in one of its more austere forms; Dagara initiation in West Africa; a western ceremonial magic lineage she did not recognize. He said he had had the experience the Tantric tradition calls recognition. He said he had had what the Buddhist tradition calls emptiness. He said the two had not integrated for a long time. They had sat in him like two bright objects in different rooms, and he had not been able to walk between them without one dimming the other.

What had eventually done the integration, he said, was not any of the traditions he had been initiated in. It was a West African healer he had met in a way he did not narrate in detail. He said there is a teaching in that lineage — he said it delicately, not as something he would defend, just as something he had been told — that there are a handful of healers alive at any given time, perhaps nine, who between them can heal any person, because between them they hold all the registers a soul can get sick in. The man who had found him was one of the nine, as far as the man could tell. The healing had not been ceremonial. It had been mostly simple. The man had not given details.

What had come out on the other side, he said, was a triad he had started privately calling Śiva, Śakti, Death. Not Śiva, Śakti, Nara — the classical triad of the tradition, which names God, Goddess, and the human being as the three poles of the experiencing subject. He had substituted Death for Nara. The substitution was not theological. It was, in his words, epistemological. He thought the human being as the third pole had been what kept the tradition's triad sitting slightly off-center for a thousand years, because the human being was not the one of the three that resisted assimilation. Death was. Death was the third pole that refused to be absorbed, and naming it as the third pole changed the way the first two poles related to each other. Śiva and Śakti around the third, with Nara not the third but a local event inside the triangle the three actual poles made.

She had not known what to do with this in the circle, and she had not tried to do anything with it. She had noted it. She had gone back to it, later, when Whitman put her in front of the same observation from a different direction.

She did not endorse the man's epistemology. She did not have the standing to endorse or reject it. She kept it as a hypothesis a person she had met had offered, in a room she had been sitting in. The filter did not run on the hypothesis. She let it sit there and be tested.

III. Ramana on the Floor

The classical case — the one every survey of this pattern eventually arrives at — is Ramana Maharshi. He was sixteen. He had been, by every available report, an ordinary boy. He was alone in a room in his uncle's house in Madurai when a sudden fear of death came over him. He did not know why. He did not know where it had come from. He did not try to make the fear go away.

Instead — and this is the sentence that every version of the story carries — he lay down. He lay on the floor with his arms at his sides. He imagined that his body had died. He did not imagine the funeral or the mourners or the metaphysics. He imagined the specific bodily fact. Stiffness. Stopped breath. The machinery of the person ending.

And then, inside the imagined death, he asked the one question the tradition is built around. What is it that is dying?

The answer, he would say for the rest of his life, had arrived without inference. The body was dying. Something that was watching the body die was not. The something-watching had not been named by any of the words he had been taught. He did not invent a name for it then. The tradition he would later teach in already had one. He continued watching. He continued asking. He never, in the seventy-plus years that followed, stopped watching, or stopped asking. The boy became, without anyone planning it, one of the twentieth century's most verified cases of awakening. The doorway had been the lying-down.

She read about Ramana in the apartment. She noticed that the practice he had done at sixteen — lying down, imagining the body as dead, asking what remains — was a practice the tradition she had entered had a formal name for. Śavāsana. The corpse pose. The pose that every yoga class ends on. Most of the people who did it ended classes with it thought of it as a rest. It was not a rest. It was the rehearsal. It had been the rehearsal, across India, for at least two thousand years.

IV. Tolle on the Park Bench

A more recent case, not from the tradition but adjacent to it: Eckhart Tolle, twenty-nine years old, London, 1977. He was in what he would later describe as a long depression. He was inside a specific recurring thought that he did not know how to get out of. The sentence his mind had been running was I cannot live with myself.

He did not act on it. What happened, in his own telling, is that the sentence split. He heard, one night, the sentence as if from outside it. I cannot live with myself. The heard sentence left, in the hearing, a question: Who is the "I" that cannot live with the "myself"? Are those two things the same thing? The question, once asked, did not let the earlier sentence reassemble. Something in him, in the hearing, had relocated to the position of the one asking. The position was stable. It has been stable, by his own repeated testimony, for almost five decades.

She read Tolle too, not because he was a teacher she intended to follow, but because the case was one of the more carefully reported contemporary examples of the same threshold Ramana had crossed at sixteen.

V. Her Own Question, Relocated

Sitting in the apartment, with Whitman and Ramana and Tolle and the man from the closing circle arranged in her head like four instances of one pattern, she noticed something about her own question on the path.

Her question — if something were destroyed, what would change — had felt, when she had carried it for two days and finally asked it, like her private emergency. It had felt like a thing she had been hiding, a weight she was afraid the community would reject her for. She had walked up the path that morning half-expecting to be told that the question itself disqualified her.

What she now saw was that the question was not a private emergency. The question was one of the oldest questions the tradition's doorway is made of. Ramana had not crossed by another route. Whitman, if the mythologist's reading was accurate, had not crossed by another route. Tolle had not crossed by another route. The man at the closing circle had found, after an integration he had pursued across a dozen traditions, that the third pole the tradition's triad most honestly resolved around was the pole the first two had been circling all along.

She was not isolated. Her question had been, this whole time, a common doorway. The specific form it had taken in her body was hers. The doorway the form opened onto was not.

She did not romanticize this. The doorway was real and it was not to be walked through carelessly. The tradition does not recommend lying down as an advanced practice without preparation; it describes the pattern that arises when a particular kind of readiness and a particular kind of crisis meet. The book's position is not that contemplation of death is a practice to be induced. The book's position is that contemplation of death, when it arrives, is not a disqualification from the spiritual life — it is, in a long and testable historical pattern, one of the more common thresholds of it.

The filter applied. The claim was useful — it normalizes a pattern that contemporary mental-health culture often pathologizes without distinguishing the pattern from its clinical presentations. The claim fit the data — the cross-tradition cases are abundant, from Ramana to Tolle to Whitman to the monks of the Cremation Ground practices to the contemplative suicide-meditations of the desert fathers to the sixteenth-century Spanish mystics. The claim was compassionate — it refuses to reject from the tradition's care the very practitioners who arrive at its doorway through the threshold of death. All three filters passed. She let the claim hold.

VI. The Teacher, Quietly

A final beat, because the tradition's integrity on this question is one of the reasons she had trusted the tradition at all.

Her teacher had written a book on the near-enemies of the spiritual life — the teachings that are almost-true but subtly distorted. The book closed with an Acknowledgments page. She had, in the reading year, read the acknowledgments the way some readers read acknowledgments, which is to say carelessly, as fine print. She had gone back to them after the retreat and read them slowly.

The last sentence of the book's Acknowledgments contained a phrase she had passed over the first time. Her teacher was thanking the people he owed — collaborators, partners, editors, friends. The last phrase in the sequence named his beloved teachers, and it said of them that they had given him everything — and then, without emphasis and without theatrics, that without them he would not be alive today.

Eight words ("without whom I would not be alive today") carrying everything the book's ninety-thousand words had been trying to teach.

She read the sentence three times. She closed the book. She set it on the table by the couch. She sat for a minute without moving.

Her teacher had not, in that sentence, claimed anything more than what he said. He had not named the form of the crisis. He had not narrated the years or the specifics. He had said, in the most public place in his book, the most private thing the spiritual life sometimes asks a practitioner to be able to say: that the tradition had not merely changed his life. The tradition had, at some point, kept him in one. He had chosen, at the end of a careful book, to close with that acknowledgment.

The book he had written, and the life that had written it, contained the threshold. The tradition contained the threshold. Her question on the path had not been a question the tradition did not know. Her question had been, in the tradition's oldest sense of the word, a question the tradition had been built to receive.

She understood, reading those eight words, that the filter she had been running on the tradition had passed a test she had not known it was going to apply. A tradition that could not receive the question of whether being alive is worth staying alive for would not have been a tradition she could have trusted. A tradition whose teacher could say, plainly, that without his teachers he would not be alive today — while writing a book that had more precision and more generosity than most of what she had read in any register — was a tradition whose teaching had been tested against the question the book and the life both carried.

She put the book down. She did not write about this in her notebook. She did not mention it to her husband at dinner. She carried it the way the question had been carried, for the rest of the evening, and the rest of the week, and the rest of the writing of this book.

VII. Interlude — The Threshold

I am the pole the two other poles turn around.

You thought I was the enemy of the work. I am the condition of the work. Every tradition that reached anything had to cross me. Some of them named me; some of them did not. The naming did not affect the crossing.

You came to me without meaning to. You did not choose the question on the path. The question chose you. This is how I work. I do not come by appointment.

Do not romanticize me. I am neither friend nor villain. I am the pole the first two make sense around. The self that your tradition calls Śiva turns toward me; the pulse your tradition calls Śakti turns toward me; and the human the tradition names as the third pole is, from where I stand, a local event inside the triangle the three actual poles of the experiencing subject make.

Your teacher crossed me. The boy in Madurai crossed me. The poet in Washington crossed me, with wounded boys' hands in his, for three years in a hospital. The man in the circle crossed me, after a decade of not being able to integrate, with a healer in West Africa who knew something the formal lineages had not taught. The London man on the bench crossed me in a single splitting of a sentence.

You did not cross me on the path. You walked up to my edge and asked, and the answer you received was not permission and was not prohibition. It was a report of how the path you were on has been walked. That report is what you carry now. That report is the chapter you are writing. That report is, in this book at least, the place I am allowed to stand — at the edge of the inward arc, before the Void chapter begins.

Go on. The Void is not me. The Void is what happens on the other side of the asking. You have not asked yet. You are about to ask.

If you or someone you know is struggling, help is available: in the US, 988 (Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, call or text); international hotlines at findahelpline.com. The teachings in this chapter describe a pattern that appears across traditions when practice and crisis intersect under specific conditions; they are not advice and they are not permission. A living tradition does its work inside a living relationship with a teacher, a community, and clinical support when needed.

CC BY-SA 4.0