Chapter 11: The Morning She Could Not Rise

The evening had given her two permissions in the same hour.

The teacher had been talking about something else when the first one arrived --- a question about knowledge that turned, midway through his answer, into a teaching about the news. He said: there were three actions a citizen could take. Vote. Call your representative. Attend a protest. That was the list. Anything beyond that was not action; it was consumption. And the consumption of information that could not be translated into action of the available kinds was not just useless. It was a burden. Knowledge that did not become action was a weight on the body that held it.

She had been writing in her journal when the line landed. She had stopped mid-sentence.

For twenty years she had organized a portion of her interior around the obligation to know what was happening. As a former equity analyst, the practice was professional muscle: read everything, weight every source, hold a model of the system in your head, refresh it daily. After she had left the firm the muscle had not atrophied; it had migrated. She had read the New York Times and the Financial Times and the Atlantic and the Guardian and three different Substacks she paid for, every morning, before her daughter was awake. The reading had felt to her like being a citizen. It had felt like taking the world seriously. It had felt like the opposite of complicity.

The teacher was saying the reading was the complicity.

Not because the reading was wrong, exactly. Because the reading was being mistaken for action. The two percent of available information that mapped to the three actions --- that was enough. The other ninety-eight percent was the rat-pellet apparatus of the attention economy, and her body had been carrying it as if it were duty.

The second permission arrived later, in the same session, on what seemed at first to be an unrelated topic. The teacher was talking about Kali. About worship of the goddess who consumed the small self. About what happens to a practitioner who has tried everything and finds that the trying itself is the obstacle. He said: sometimes, for some people, the grasping fell away in a moment of total surrender. The surrender came when the person was literally ready to die. Sometimes people are just ready to die. They're literally ready to die. So because they're ready to die, literally, they surrender without even realizing what they're doing. The willingness to die was a doorway, he said. Not the death. The willingness.

She had already had one conversation about suicide at the retreat by then, with one of the people on the support team. Not because she was at risk. She had been careful to name that immediately. Because she was puzzled by how the tradition seemed to hold it --- not as the cardinal sin her Catholic upbringing had treated it as, not as the unredeemable departure, but as something the tradition seemed able to discuss without horror. She had cited the closing line of Near Enemies of the Truth to the support-team person, the way one cites a footnote in an analyst note. The conversation had been brief and clear-headed. The support-team person had been a presence, not a clinician --- there to receive, not to assess. She had felt received.

Now, sitting in the chair listening to the teacher say ready to die, literally, she felt both permissions arrive in the same body, and she felt the body absorb them in a way the head had not yet caught up to.

She went to her room early. She did not write before sleep. She put the journal on the small bedside table beside the water glass, and she lay down, and she felt the first drag of the cramp that meant her period had begun.

She did not get up at six-thirty.

The body would not move. Not in the depressive sense --- there was no weight, no pull toward cancellation. The body just did not move. She lay on her side with the warmth between her legs and the cramps coming in low waves and the morning light on the white wall opposite the bed, and she watched the wall, and the wall did not require anything of her, and she did not require anything of it.

She had thought about depression for long enough to know what this was not. Depression had a color. This had no color. The grief that was working through her had a quality she had not encountered before in herself: it was organizing something. The body was not in collapse. The body was sorting.

She let the sorting happen.

What could she keep, after what the previous night had said.

She could keep her daughter's nervous system. The five-year-old, who ran hot, whose vulva had been itching for weeks, whose mother had been pretending the answer was a better explanation about anatomy. She could keep the parental work the teacher had named two days ago --- settle your own body first; the daughter borrows what the mother can offer. None of that was canceled by the news teaching. The work was upstream of the news.

She could keep her share of voice and her share of dollars. The teacher had said no political endorsements in the container of the retreat, and the container had been correct, but the world the container was inside still existed. The choice of lab still mattered. The two-minute speech she had drafted in her notebook --- let go of my right to ask any further question in exchange for two minutes of political speech for what I believe to be beneficial to all in this room --- that draft was not erased by the don't read the news teaching. It was sharpened by it. The speech was the kind of action the teacher had named: a call, a redirection, a use of her voice in the small room where her voice could land. Not consumption. Not knowing-about. Doing.

She could keep her work on the platform --- the responsibility infrastructure that was being built every day in the small co-working space she ran out of her apartment. That work was action. The recursive grammars that were taking shape with the help of language models she could not finally vouch for, in service of a practice that predated the models by millennia. Compromised. Imperfect. Honest about the compromise. Action.

What did she have to set down.

The daily news consumption. The performance of taking it seriously. The Substack subscriptions that were not feeding the three actions. The shame of not having read the morning's editorial. The political-debate participation on threads that resolved nothing. The drama-addiction that had been disguising itself as civic duty for twenty years.

She set it down on the floor beside the bed, metaphorically, and she felt the floor receive it, and she felt her chest open by what seemed like a measurable amount.

The grief continued.

It was generative grief. She had read enough Linehan to know there was a name for this --- not in Linehan exactly, but in the Buddhist literature Linehan had read --- the grief that arose when a structure that had been carrying you turned out to have been carrying you wrongly. The grief was not for what was lost. The grief was for the years of having been mistaken about what was load-bearing.

She had been mistaken about what was load-bearing.

Reading had not been the load-bearing element. Reading had been the noise around the load-bearing element. The load-bearing element was the small set of acts she could actually perform: vote, call, attend, speak, build. And the small set of bodies she could actually settle: hers, her daughter's, her husband's, the people on the cushion next to her, the people in the room when they showed up.

Everything else was the rat pellet.

The cramps came in waves. She did not fight them. The blood was warm. The body was doing what the body did on this day of the month, and the doing of it was the same kind of working-through as the grief --- a parasympathetic protocol the body knew how to run if the head would stop interfering.

She thought: my daughter runs hot. My daughter has too much pitta. The teacher said so on Day One. The teacher did not say it about me. But the teacher could have. The mother runs hot too. The mother has been overriding the body's cooler signals for years because the head had a theory about what citizenship required.

This was not a small recognition.

She was not a person who ran cool by temperament. She was a person who ran hot by temperament and had been calling the heat intelligence and engagement and competence for as long as she could remember, and the heat had earned her promotions and audiences and a daughter and a marriage and a platform, and the heat had also been the medium through which her daughter had been borrowing the patterns the mother was trying to spare her. The mother who ran hot was the mechanism by which the daughter ran hot. The chain went further upstream than the bedtime story.

The teacher's word --- pitta --- had been said in passing, as an aside, about a five-year-old. She had not realized until this morning that the aside had been a diagnosis of the lineage.

She drafted the question.

She had been carrying it the whole retreat. She had not asked it on Day One; she had not asked it on Day Two; it had been the question underneath every other question she had asked. The question was: is it an axiom that all beings have value? And the long form: Wellbeing as intrinsic value? All beings? COVID, cholera, humans?

The long form was the form that mattered. Because the question was not whether human beings had value. The question was what all beings meant, and whether the answer included the things that wanted to kill humans, and the things that humans wanted to kill, and the things that wanted to kill themselves, and the things that had no consciousness in any sense the questioner could verify, and whether the axiom could survive the inclusion. Or whether the axiom was a story humans told themselves so they could go on, and whether the story being a story was a problem, or whether the story being a story was the only kind of axiom that was available in the first place.

She wrote the question in her notebook in her cleanest handwriting. Wellbeing as intrinsic value? All beings? COVID, cholera, humans?

She wrote underneath it, in smaller letters: if no, then on what ground does any teaching here stand?

She wrote, in even smaller letters: if yes, then how do I act when the answer requires me to harm one being for the sake of another?

She closed the notebook.

The cramp eased. She moved one leg, then the other. The body was returning. The grief had not gone. The grief was now part of her, the way the period was part of her --- present, real, working, not in the way of anything.

She sat up. She drank the water. She wrote a single line on a fresh page: what would I share, if I had the chance. The line was the bridge. She would speak today. She would offer, in some form the container could accept, the speech she had been drafting. She would ask the question she had been holding. She would do the three actions in the registers available to her: vote, in the next election, with what she had now learned. Call, the relevant representatives, when she got home. Attend, this morning's session, with the body that had finally agreed to rise.

Action. Not consumption.

She got out of bed at a quarter past nine. The session had started at eight. She walked to the hall in her ordinary clothes and the cramp was still there, low, and the blood was still moving, and she sat down on a cushion at the back and someone she did not know smiled at her without asking why she was late.

The teacher was already talking. She listened.

CC BY-SA 4.0